Changing integration of EMU public property markets

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2011.09.001Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of the European Monetary Union (EMU) on European public property market integration. Results indicate that the property markets are long-run independent and show little evidence of short-run relationships prior to the formation of the EMU. However, the degree of interdependence and the extent of convergence among the largest property markets have intensified substantially after the launch of the Euro as the common currency in January, 1999. Moreover, each of the property markets under consideration is endogenous in that none is found to “dominate” the others toward long-run equilibrium. Short-run results indicate substantial interrelationships among the markets after the adoption of the Euro. Finally, the study shows that stock markets, bond markets, and public property markets follow similar convergence patterns.

Highlights

► We examine the impact of the European Monetary Union (EMU) on European public property market integration. ► We find that the degree of interdependence and the extent of convergence among the largest property markets have intensified substantially after the launch of the Euro as the common currency in January, 1999. ► We also show that stock markets, bond markets, and public property markets follow similar convergence patterns.

Introduction

The degree to which international capital markets have become interrelated has long been a source of intrigue and interest to academics and practitioners alike (Koutmos and Booth, 1995, Booth et al., 1996, Booth et al., 1997, Kim et al., 2006a, Kim et al., 2006b, Alexakis, 2010). The financial markets in the Euro-zone are especially appealing to study, because of the ongoing changes brought about by the economic and monetary unification process. Several studies have examined the impact of the European Monetary Union (EMU) on stock market and bond market linkages (Haug et al., 2000, Syriopoulos, 2006, Morelli, 2010, Demian, 2011), and most of these studies suggest that the EMU has significantly increased the degree of interdependence among member countries’ equity and bond markets. Authors such as Holmes and Maghrebi, 2008, Lein et al. (2008) and Arghyrou et al. (2009) contend that these increasing dynamic interrelationships may be attributed primarily to economic convergence stimulated by the monetary and economic policy rules and criteria imposed by the Maastricht Treaty.

Most of the studies, have focused largely on equity markets and bond markets with little attention given to European public property markets. Specifically this paper analyzes the impact of the EMU (hereafter “EMU” is used to indicate implementation of the Euro in January of 1999) on European property market integration. In essence, it compares the dynamic interaction among the securitized property markets of six major EMU economies prior to and after the formation of the EMU and evaluates the changing extent of convergence among these markets. Evidence suggests that property markets tend to be affected by the same macroeconomic fundamentals that drive equities and bonds (McCue and Kling, 1994), hence, it is hypothesized that the degree of interdependence among the property stock markets within the Euro-zone has increased since the formation of the EMU and the launch of the common currency in January, 1999.2

This study makes important contributions to existing literature. It utilizes robust methodologies for a relatively long period of time (January 1990 to December 2007) to analyze and compare long-run interdependent relationships and short-run linkages among major EMU member property markets prior to and after the establishment of the EMU. Using recursive cointegration introduced by Hansen and Johansen (1999), it examines whether EMU member property markets have become increasingly convergent with the passage of time and especially after the adoption of the Euro in January, 1999.

Also, following Phylaktis and Ravazzolo (2005) the study examines whether one or more of the property markets can be regarded as primary “drivers” that dominate the other markets and binds them in long-run equilibrium relation(s). Next, it examines whether short-run causal relationships changed after formation of the EMU. And finally, the study analyzes whether the convergence pattern of European public property markets resembles those of the general stock markets or bond markets.

By focusing explicitly on the changing level of integration among the public property markets of major EMU economies, before and after the adoption of the Euro, this paper extends the work by authors such as Wilson and Okunev (1996), Wilson and Zurbruegg (2001), and Yunus (2009) who had examined the impact of globalization on the integration among major securitized property markets. Moreover, by examining the convergence pattern of the securitized property markets in comparison to those of the general equity markets and bond markets, this paper extends studies by Lizieri et al. (2002) and Yang et al. (2005) who had focused solely on the dynamic interactions among the real estate markets of major EMU economies. Further, by implementing robust econometric techniques and several relatively new diagnostic tests, the current study substantially improves on prior work that had evaluated interrelationships among the property markets of selected EMU economies.

The study offers some important implications. If the degree of integration among the property markets has intensified over time, and especially after the establishment of the EMU, such findings imply that the markets may be (increasingly) affected by the same economic stimuli, such that shocks to one market are easily propagated to other markets. This suggests that elimination of internal exchange rate risk as well as monetary and economic policy convergence have played a role in the increased property integration, reducing diversification benefits from investing in different major Euro member countries’ property markets. Thus the findings will be beneficial to investors interested in allocating portfolio assets within the European securitized property sector and to EMU policymakers concerned with real property pricing in making better informed economic policy decisions.

The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 presents a relevant literature review; Section 3 sets forth a brief description of the data; Section 4 discusses the methodology; Section 5 examines empirical results; and, finally, Section 6 contains concluding remarks.

Section snippets

Literature review

Numerous studies such as Haug et al. (2000) Syriopoulos (2006), Morelli (2010) and Demian (2011) have examined the impact of the EMU on equity market and bond market linkages. Most of these studies find that equity markets of EMU member economies have become increasingly integrated, especially after the introduction of the Euro in January, 1999.

Several authors have taken the analysis a step further and contend that financial market integration among EMU member countries can be attributed

Data

The data employed consists of publicly traded real estate stock price indices quoted on a weekly basis, provided by the European Public Real Estate Association (EPRA) and the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) for the public property markets of six core EMU economies: Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands and Spain. 3

Methodology

A number of relatively new time series techniques and diagnostic tests are applied to robustly evaluate the univariate and multivariate properties of the property markets under consideration. First, unit root tests determine the order of integration, followed by multivariate cointegration tests to identify long-run equilibrium relationship(s) among the markets. If evidence of cointegration is found, hypothesis tests are implemented to evaluate the markets that form the cointegration space and

Unit root tests

Table 1 summarizes the results of the Ng and Perron (2001) unit root tests for the property markets of Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain. The null hypothesis of nonstationarity cannot be rejected for any of the series at the conventional level of significance. The results are consistent across each sub-period and are similar to those of Yang et al. (2005) who find unit roots in the securitized property indices of several European property markets. Since the property

Conclusions

This paper analyzes the impact of the EMU on European public property market integration. It contributes to the literature by: (a) evaluating and comparing the extent of long-run relationships among the securitized property markets of major EMU economies prior to and after the adoption of the Euro over a relatively long period of time, (b) analyzing the progression of linkages among these markets to identify the gradual and ongoing evolution of linkages over time (c) utilizing improved and

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Professor Geoffrey Booth (Editor), and an anonymous referee for their valuable comments, suggestions and advice.

References (39)

  • S. Johansen

    Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors

    Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control

    (1988)
  • S.J. Kim et al.

    Dynamics of bond market integration between established and accession European Union countries

    Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money

    (2006)
  • S.J. Kim et al.

    Dynamic stock-market integration given by the European Monetary Union: an empirical analysis

    Journal of Banking and Finance

    (2005)
  • S.J. Kim et al.

    Dynamics of bond market integration between established and accession European Union countries

    International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money

    (2006)
  • G. Koutmos et al.

    Asymmetric volatility transmission in international stock markets

    Journal of International Money and Finance

    (1995)
  • S.M. Lein et al.

    How is real convergence driving nominal convergence in the new EU member states?

    Journal of International Money and Finance

    (2008)
  • D. Morelli

    European capital market integration: An empirical study based on a European asset pricing model

    Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money

    (2010)
  • K. Phylaktis et al.

    Stock market linkages in emerging markets: implications for international portfolio diversification

    Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money

    (2005)
  • J. Rangvid

    Increasing convergence among European stock markets? A recursive common stochastic trends analysis

    Economics Letters

    (2001)
  • Cited by (3)

    • Interdependence between the bond markets of CEEC-3 and Germany: A wavelet coherence analysis

      2015, North American Journal of Economics and Finance
      Citation Excerpt :

      The second type of model is the causality test, employed to investigate the cause–effect relationship.2 Gómez-Puig and Sosvilla-Rivero (2013) and Yunus and Swanson (2012) found that Granger causality significantly increases during certain key periods, such as the launch of the EMU in 1999, the circulation of the euro in 2002, and the global financial crisis in 2008. The third type is the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH), a volatility-based model, employed to investigate the interdependence between markets.

    1

    Tel.: +1 817 272 3841.

    View full text